What was Texas SB 30?
Texas SB 30 was the 2025 nuclear-verdict reform package that died in conference committee. Defense firms are hiring senior trial lawyers now instead of waiting for the 2027 session.
Senate Bill 30 was carried by Sen. Charles Schwertner and sponsored in the House by Rep. Greg Bonnen, who also filed HB 4806. Both went after how Texas juries award damages.
As filed, SB 30 required a unanimous jury for pain-and-suffering awards. The usual rule under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 292 is ten of twelve. It also let a defendant ask the judge to explain a noneconomic award above set dollar thresholds.
The Senate version limited past medical expense evidence to amounts paid or, failing that, 300 percent of the 2025 Medicare fee schedule. Future medical expenses were capped at 300 percent of Medicare.
Neither bill became law. HB 4806 never left the House Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee. SB 30 passed the Senate on April 16, 2025. The House passed a narrower version on May 28. Both chambers named conferees on May 29 and 30. The session ended June 2 with no conference report.
The legislature meets every two years. The next regular session is 2027, roughly nineteen months of the pre-reform trial environment from the day the bills failed. This is general information, not legal advice.
- Jury must be unanimous on pain and suffering awards
- As filed
- Required (s. 41.151)
- Passed Senate
- Dropped
- House committee substitute
- Not included
- Standards for noneconomic awards
- As filed
- Awards must rest on evidence of the nature, duration and severity of the injury, and arguing values with no rational connection to the facts is reversible error (s. 41.151)
- Passed Senate
- Kept in rewritten form (s. 41.151): awards must be grounded in the evidence and can't be used to punish, and anchoring arguments with no rational connection to the facts are reversible error
- House committee substitute
- Not included
- Review of large noneconomic awards
- As filed
- On request, the judge must explain awards above $250,000 for mental anguish with bodily injury, $1 million for wrongful death or emotional injury, or for physical pain the lesser of 3 times medical expenses or $100,000 per year of life expectancy
- Passed Senate
- Removed
- House committee substitute
- Not included
- Past medical expense evidence
- As filed
- Amounts paid, else up to 150 percent of the median commercial payer rate in the Texas All Payor Claims Database
- Passed Senate
- Amounts paid, else up to 300 percent of the 2025 Medicare fee schedule, adjusted for inflation
- House committee substitute
- Amounts paid by third-party payors, else a list of evidence: Medicare allowable, workers' compensation fee guideline, 50th percentile allowed amount, or billed charges
- Future medical expenses
- As filed
- Reasonable value, using the same database
- Passed Senate
- Reasonable value, capped at 300 percent of Medicare
- House committee substitute
- Same list of evidence as past expenses
- Letter of protection disclosure
- As filed
- Required
- Passed Senate
- Required
- House committee substitute
- Required
| Provision | As filed (March 13) | Passed Senate (April 16) | House committee substitute |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jury must be unanimous on pain and suffering awards | Required (s. 41.151) | Dropped | Not included |
| Standards for noneconomic awards | Awards must rest on evidence of the nature, duration and severity of the injury, and arguing values with no rational connection to the facts is reversible error (s. 41.151) | Kept in rewritten form (s. 41.151): awards must be grounded in the evidence and can't be used to punish, and anchoring arguments with no rational connection to the facts are reversible error | Not included |
| Review of large noneconomic awards | On request, the judge must explain awards above $250,000 for mental anguish with bodily injury, $1 million for wrongful death or emotional injury, or for physical pain the lesser of 3 times medical expenses or $100,000 per year of life expectancy | Removed | Not included |
| Past medical expense evidence | Amounts paid, else up to 150 percent of the median commercial payer rate in the Texas All Payor Claims Database | Amounts paid, else up to 300 percent of the 2025 Medicare fee schedule, adjusted for inflation | Amounts paid by third-party payors, else a list of evidence: Medicare allowable, workers' compensation fee guideline, 50th percentile allowed amount, or billed charges |
| Future medical expenses | Reasonable value, using the same database | Reasonable value, capped at 300 percent of Medicare | Same list of evidence as past expenses |
| Letter of protection disclosure | Required | Required | Required |
What does SB 30's failure mean for Texas defense firms?
The verdicts the bills targeted keep coming. Defense firms can't build a hiring plan around a law that might show up in two years.
The next big case gets tried in 2026, before any 2027 vote. The lawyer trying it has to be on staff now.
This is what we are seeing in Texas: defense firms are hiring at higher class years. They are stretching above their historical bands to lock in proven trial experience.
Which Texas defense practices are hiring?
Trucking and commercial transportation defense, premises liability for retail and hospitality, construction defect on large projects, and product liability. Those had senior-level openings in Houston and Dallas in the Texas searches we ran in early 2026.
These insurance defense firms want first-chair trial experience and a lawyer who will try a case others would settle.
Some firms staffing the largest Texas trials will now hire from plaintiff practices or out-of-state commercial litigation. The candidate has to be able to stand up in front of a jury. Trial credit counts for more than pedigree.
I'd ask a candidate how many cases they have taken to verdict.
Why do senior trial lawyers cost more in Texas now?
Senior trial lawyers in Texas have more bargaining power than a few years ago. We think the failure of SB 30 is part of why.
No statute is coming. The lawyer who can try a hard case to a Texas jury is the firm's main defense against a big verdict.
When a firm asks us for a senior trial lateral, we tell it to be ready to move on two things. Origination credit and partnership timing, not base alone. These lawyers know what they're worth. What partnership timeline can you put in writing? I'd settle that before the first interview, not after the offer.
Will Texas tort reform come back in 2027?
It may. Bills for the 90th Legislature can be filed starting November 9, 2026, and the session convenes January 12, 2027.
Both chambers passed medical-cost evidence rules in 2025, in different forms. We think that is the likeliest ground for a compromise.
If a compromise passes, verdict risk on some cases drops and hiring plans change with it. If it fails again, the current pattern runs another two years.
I'd hire through the 2027 session as if reform isn't coming, and treat any relief that does pass as upside. Trial lawyers stay hard to find either way, and firms that wait for 2027 will hire behind competitors that didn't. How soon are you looking to add a trial lawyer, now or after the 2027 session?
- March 13, 2025SB 30 (Schwertner) and HB 4806 (Bonnen) filed
- March 31Senate committee hearing on SB 30, left pending
- April 14Senate committee reports SB 30 as substituted
- April 16Senate passes SB 30
- May 7HB 4806 heard in House committee and left pending. It never moves
- May 21House committee reports a substitute SB 30
- May 28House passes SB 30 as amended
- May 29 and 30Senate refuses to concur and asks for a conference committee. Both chambers name conferees
- June 2Session ends with no conference report
- January 12, 202790th regular session convenes
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| March 13, 2025 | SB 30 (Schwertner) and HB 4806 (Bonnen) filed |
| March 31 | Senate committee hearing on SB 30, left pending |
| April 14 | Senate committee reports SB 30 as substituted |
| April 16 | Senate passes SB 30 |
| May 7 | HB 4806 heard in House committee and left pending. It never moves |
| May 21 | House committee reports a substitute SB 30 |
| May 28 | House passes SB 30 as amended |
| May 29 and 30 | Senate refuses to concur and asks for a conference committee. Both chambers name conferees |
| June 2 | Session ends with no conference report |
| January 12, 2027 | 90th regular session convenes |
Common Questions
What would SB 30 have changed about Texas jury verdicts?
Did Texas SB 30 pass?
How are Texas defense firms hiring after SB 30 failed?
Open insurance defense searches
Each firm is confidential. We name the firm before anything about you is shared, and we don't share résumés or names without your permission.
- Insurance Defense Litigation AttorneyWest Palm Beach, FL · In office · 1 to 8 years
- Insurance Defense Litigation AttorneySt. Petersburg, FL · In office · 1 to 8 years
- Insurance Defense and Business Litigation AssociateTampa, FL · In office · 0 to 5 years$85,000 to $175,000
- Casualty Insurance Defense AssociateSan Jose, CA · In office · 3+ years$145,000 to $180,000